Watch Beauty and the Beast 2017 Movie WEB-DL This is a file losslessly ripped from a streaming service, such as Netflix, Amazon Video, Hulu, Crunchyroll, Discovery GO, BBC iPlayer, etc.
So what happened? What did they spend the 200 million budget on? I'm sorry to say it, but this film represents a huge missed opportunity for Disney.User rating: 8.7 / 10 (Based on 5777 Reviews)īeauty and the Beast 2017 Movie Overview:Ī live-action adaptation of Disney's version of the classic tale of a cursed prince and a beautiful young woman who helps him break the spell. Since then we got films like 'Dawn of the Planet of the Apes' and 'Jungle Book' that looked even better and more realistic. It's been almost 10 years since we got a completely convincing CGI "beast" face with Peter Jackson's King Kong, complete with alive looking eyes and natural facial expressions. Beast's face never looks real and that's just not acceptable. It's mind-boggling to me how a gigantic company like Disney lets a film open if the most important CGI effects obviously don't look convincing yet. The one actor who makes something of his role is, naturally, the one who plays the baddie Luke Evans at least looks like he's having fun. Great actors like Kevin Kline are simply wasted because they have nothing to do besides just being there and have a certain look. Emma Watson isn't half bad as Belle, but her acting feels forced in a way you can practically read the directions she gets from her director on her face ("now act SURPRISED" - "now show us a sense of WONDER" - "now look SAD"). And that's what I don't get: if you have the chance to make a film that will make 1.5 billion dollars (given the reviews are good) - wouldn't you want to make sure to make the best looking film possible? But over large stretches this film has the mediocre looking CGI of a cheap Lionsgate fantasy film and the nuanced color-grading of a bowl of M&Ms. Now the good news is, 'Beauty and the Beast' is nowhere near as bad as the Twilight films, but it DOES bear a striking visual resemblance to those teen shlock movies. There are porn films who look better and have better plots (seriously).
Come on Disney: what were you thinking?! You've got one of the most beloved films in your entire catalogue the first animated film ever that was nominated for a best picture Oscar - and you give the new version of that film to the director of 'Twilight' parts 3 and 4? Has anyone of your executives even seen Bill Condon's 'Twilight' films or did you just look at all the money they made during their opening weekend? Just so you know: those films are atrocious.
0 kommentar(er)
